International Cooperation
International Cooperation
☑️ This element is an expansion of the content of Lawi's courses, guides, tools and other solutions. It offers facts, commentary, and analysis on this topic. Do you like what you read? Can I ask a favor from you? Like and share it with your family and friends so that others can discover it too. If you have been forwarded this element, please subscribe here.
International Cooperation
Resources
Professional Content and Learning Tools
Lawi offers educational solutions and professional insight, integrating content, tools, and practical technology to promote lifelong learning, personal and professional improvement, and human progress through knowledge. Our collections feature resources and solutions from a wide range of subject areas, from management and finance to law and cybersecurity. This text is only a brief introduction. If you would like us to expand on this content, please let us know in the comments. If you’re finding our platform and publications valuable, share it with a colleague or friend, leave a comment and consider subscribing if you haven’t already (thanks!). There are group discounts, gift options, and referral bonuses available.
See Also
Including similar content viewed by others, in case you missed it:
Resources
Professional Content and Learning Tools
Lawi offers educational solutions and professional insight, integrating content, tools, and practical technology to promote lifelong learning, personal and professional improvement, and human progress through knowledge. Our collections feature resources and solutions from a wide range of subject areas, from management and finance to law and cybersecurity. This text is only a brief introduction. If you would like us to expand on this content, please let us know in the comments. If you’re finding our platform and publications valuable, share it with a colleague or friend, leave a comment and consider subscribing if you haven’t already (thanks!). There are group discounts, gift options, and referral bonuses available.
See Also
Including similar content viewed by others, in case you missed it:
Further Reading
Information related to international cooperation in the Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law(MPEPIL), Germany, United Kingdom
Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (1998). Why states act through formal international organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42(1), 3–32.
Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (2015). International organizations as orchestrators. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Allee, T., & Peinhardt, C. (2014). Evaluating three explanations for the design of bilateral investment treaties. World Politics, 66(01), 47–87.
Axelrod, R. (1981). The emergence of cooperation among egoists. American Political Science Review, 75, 306–318.
Axelrod, R., & Keohane, R. O. (1985). Achieving cooperation under anarchy: Strategies and institutions. World Politics, 38(1), 226–254.
Bättig, M. B., & Bernauer, T. (2009). National institutions and global public goods: Are democracies more cooperative in climate change policy? International Organization, 63(2), 281–308.
Brewster, R. (2004). The domestic origins of international agreements. Virginia Journal of International Law, 44(2), 501–544.
Busch, M. L., & Reinhardt, E. (2002). Testing international trade law: Empirical studies of GATT/WTO dispute settlement.
In D. L. Kennedy & J. D. Southwick (Eds.), The political economy of international trade law: Essays in honor of Robert E. Hudec (pp. 457–481). New York: Cambridge University Press,
Calvert, R. (1995). Rational actors, equilibrium, and social institutions.
In J. Knight & I. Sened (Eds.), Explaining social institutions (pp. 57–93). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cederman, L-E. (1997). Emergent actors in world politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Chaudoin, S. (2014). Audience features and the strategic timing of trade disputes. International Organization, 68(04), 877–911.
Conybeare, J. (1987). Trade wars: The theory and practice of international commercial rivalry. New York: Columbia University Press.
Dai, X. (2002a). Information systems in treaty regimes. World Politics, 54(4), 405–436.
Dai, X. (2005). Why comply? The domestic constituency mechanism. International Organization, 59(2), 363–398.
Dai, X. (2006b). The conditional nature of democratic compliance. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(5), 690–713.
Davis, C. L. (2004). International institutions and issue linkage: Building support for agricultural trade liberalization. American Political Science Review, 98(1), 153–169.
Downs, G. W., & Jones, M. A. (2002). Reputation, compliance, and international law. Journal of Legal Studies, 31(1), S95–S114.
Downs, G. W., Rocke, D. M., & Barsoom, P. N. (1996). Is the good news about compliance good news about cooperation? International Organization, 50(3), 379–406.
Drezner, D. W. (1999). The sanctions paradox: Economic statecraft and international relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Drezner, D. W. (2014). The system worked: How the world stopped another Great Depression. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elsig, M. (2011). Principal–agent theory and the World Trade Organization: Complex agency and “missing delegation.” European Journal of International Relations, 17(3), 495–517.
Fang, S. (2008). The informational role of international institutions and domestic politics. American Journal of Political Science, 52(2), 304–321.
Fearon, J. D. (1994). Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review, 88(3), 577–592.
Fearon, J. D. (1998). Bargaining, enforcement, and international cooperation. International Organization, 52(2), 269–305.
Ferejohn, J. (1991). Rationality and interpretation: Parliamentary elections in early Stuart England.
In K. Monroe (Ed.), The economic approach to politics: A critical reassessment of the theory of rational action. New York: HarperCollins.
Fioretes, O. (Ed.). (2016). International politics and institutions in time. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Gartzke, E., & Gleditsch, K. (2004). Why democracies may actually be less reliable allies. American Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 775–795.
Gilligan, M. J. (2004). Is there a broader-deeper trade-off in international multilateral agreements? International Organization, 58(2), 459–484.
Goldstein, J. L. (1996). International law and domestic institutions: Reconciling North American unfair trade laws. International Organization, 50(4), 541–564.
Goldstein, J. S., & Pevehouse, J. C. (1997). Reciprocity, bullying, and international cooperation: Time-series analysis of the Bosnia conflict. American Political Science Review, 91(3), 515–529.
Green, J. F., & Colgan, J. (2013). Protecting sovereignty, protecting the planet: State delegation to international organizations and private actors in environmental politics. Governance, 26(3), 473–497.
Greif, A. (2006). Institutions and the path to the modern economy: Lessons from medieval trade. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Grieco, J. (1988). Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: A realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism. International Organization, 42(3), 485–507.
Guzman, A. (2007). How international law works: A rational choice theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haas, P., Keohane, R. O., & Levy, M. (Eds.). (1993). Institutions for the earth: Sources of effective international environmental protection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hafner-Burton, E. M., & Montgomery, A. H. (2006). Power positions international organizations, social networks, and conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(1), 3–27.
Hall, T. H. (2011). We will not swallow this bitter fruit: Theorizing a diplomacy of anger. Security Studies, 20(4), 521–555.
Helfer, L. R., & Voeten, E. (2014). International courts as agents of legal change: Evidence from LGBT rights in Europe. International Organization, 68(01), 77–110.
Hoffmann, M. J. (2010). Norms and social constructivism in international relations. The International Studies Encyclopedia, 8, 5410–5426.
Iida, K. (1993). When and how do domestic constraints matter? Two-level games with uncertainty. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37(3), 403–426.
Jensen, N. (2003). Democratic governance and multinational corporations: Political regimes and inflows of foreign direct investment. International Organization, 57(3), 587–616.
Johns, L. (2014). Depth versus rigidity in the design of international trade agreements. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 26(3), 468–495.
Kaul, I., Conceicao, P., Le Goulven, K., & Mendoza, R. U. (Eds.). (2003). Providing global public goods: managing globalization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, R. O., & Martin, L. L. (1995). The promise of institutional theory. International Security, 20(1), 39–51.
Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9(01), 7–23.
Kertzer, J. D., & McGraw, K. (2012). Folk realism: Testing the microfoundations of realism in ordinary citizens. International Studies Quarterly, 56(2), 245–258.
Kinne, B. J. (2013). Network dynamics and the evolution of international cooperation. American Political Science Review, 107(04), 766–785.
Koremenos, B. (2001). Loosening the ties that bind: A learning model of agreement flexibility. International Organization, 55(2), 289–325.
Krasner, S. D. (1982). Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables. International Organization, 36(2), 185–205.
Kreps, D. (1990). Corporate culture and economic theory.
In J. Alt & K. Shepsle (Eds.), Perspectives on positive political economy (pp. 90–143). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kuo, R., Johnson D. D. P., & Toft, M. D. (2015). Correspondence: Evolution and territorial conflict. International Security, 39(3), 190–201.
Lake, D. A. (1993). Leadership, hegemony, and the international economy: Naked emperor or tattered monarch with potential? International Studies Quarterly, 37(4), 459–489.
Leeds, B. A. (1999). Domestic political institutions, credible commitments, and international cooperation. American Journal of Political Science, 43(4), 979–1002.
Leeds, B. A., & Savun, B. (2007). Terminating alliances: Why do states abrogate agreements? Journal of Politics, 69(4), 1118–1132.
Lipson, C. (1984). International cooperation in economic and security affairs. World Politics, 37(1), 1–23.
Lipson, C. (2003). Reliable partners: How democracies have made a separable peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lupu, Y. (2013). Best evidence: The role of information in domestic judicial enforcement of international human rights agreements. International Organization, 67(03), 469–503.
Mansfield, E. D., Milner, H. V., & Rosendorff, B. P. (2000). Free to trade: Democracies, autocracies, and international trade. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 305–321.
Martin, L. L. (1992a). Coercive cooperation: Explaining multilateral economic sanctions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Martin, L. L. (1993). The rational state choice of multilateralism.
In J. G. Ruggie (Ed.), Multilateralism matters (pp. 91–121). New York: Columbia University Press.
Mattes, M., & Rodríguez, M. (2014). Autocracies and international cooperation. International Studies Quarterly, 58(3), 527–538.
Mayer, F. W. (1992). Managing domestic differences in international negotiations: The strategic use of internal side-payments. International Organization, 46(4), 793–818.
McGillivray, F., & Smith, A. (2000). Trust and cooperation through agent specific punishments. International Organization, 54(4), 809–824.
Mearsheimer, J. (1995). The false promise of international institutions. International Security, 19(3), 5–49.
Mercer, J. (1996). Reputation and international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Mercer, J. (2010). Emotional beliefs. International Organization, 64(1), 1–31.
Milgrom, P., North, D., & Weingast, B. (1990). The role of institutions in the revival of trade: The medieval law merchant, private judges, and the champagne fairs. Economics and Politics, 2(1), 1–23.
Milner, H.V. (1997). Interests, institutions, and information: Domestic politics and international relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mitchell, R. B. (1994a). Intentional oil pollution at sea: Environmental policy and treaty compliance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mo, J. (1994). The logic of two-level games with endogenous domestic coalitions. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 38(3), 402–422.
Moravcsik, A. (2000). The origins of human rights regimes: Democratic delegation in postwar Europe. International Organization, 54(2), 217–252.
Morrow, J. D. (2002). The laws of war, common conjectures, and legal systems in international politics. Journal of Legal Studies, 31(1), S41–S60.
Morse, J. C., & Keohane, R. O. (2014). Contested multilateralism. Review of International Organizations, 9(4), 385–412.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ostrom, E., & Keohane, R. O. (1995). Local commons and global interdependence: Heterogeneity and cooperation in two domains. London: SAGE.
Pahre, R. (1997). Endogenous domestic institutions in two-level games and parliamentary oversight of the European Union. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(1), 147–174.
Powell, E. J., & Staton, J. K. (2009). Domestic judicial institutions and human rights treaty violation. International Studies Quarterly, 53(1), 149–174.
Powell, R. (1994). Anarchy in international relations theory. International Organization, 48(2), 313–344.
Rathbun, B. C. (2011). Trust in international cooperation: International security institutions, domestic politics and American multilateralism (Vol. 121). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reus-Smit, C., & Snidal, D. (2008) Reuniting ethics and social science: The Oxford handbook of international relations. Ethics and International Affairs, 22(3), 261–271.
Sampson, M. (2016). The strategic logic of international agreement design (Doctoral dissertation). University of Oxford.
Schelling, T. C. (1980). The strategy of conflict (2d ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schoppa, L. J. (1993). Two-level games and bargaining outcomes: Why Gaiatsu succeeds in Japan in some cases but not others. International Organization, 47(3), 353–386.
Schultz, K. A. (1998). Domestic opposition and signaling in international crises. American Political Science Review, 92(4), 829–844.
Sebenius, J. (1983). Negotiation arithmetic: Adding and subtracting issues and parties. International Organization, 37(2), 281–316.
Shepsle, K., & Weingast, B. (1987). The institutional foundations of committee power. American Political Science Review, 81(1), 85–104.
Simmons, B. A. (2009). Mobilizing for human rights: International law in domestic politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, A. (1998) International crises and domestic politics. American Political Science Review, 92(3), 623–638.
Snidal, D. (1985a). The limits of hegemonic stability theory. International Organization, 39(4), 579–614.
Snidal, D. (1991). Relative gains and the pattern of international cooperation. American Political Science Review, 85(3), 701–726.
Stein, A. (1983). Coordination and collaboration: Regimes in an anarchic world.
In S. D. Krasner (Ed.), International regimes (pp. 115–141). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press,
Stone, R. W. (2011). Controlling institutions: International organizations and the global economy. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Stone, R. W., Slantchev, B. L., & London, T. R. (2008). Choosing how to cooperate: A repeated public-goods model of international relations. International Studies Quarterly, 52(2), 335–362.
Tallberg, J. (2002). Paths to compliance: Enforcement, management, and the European Union. International Organization, 56(3), 609–643.
Taylor, M. (1976). Anarchy and cooperation. London: Wiley.
Thompson, A. (2010). Rational design in motion: Uncertainty and flexibility in the global climate regime. European Journal of International Relations, 16(2), 269–296.
Underdal, A., & Hanf, K. (Eds.). (2000). International environmental agreements and domestic politics: The case of acid rain. Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate.
Hierarchical Display of International cooperation
International Relations > Cooperation policy > Cooperation policy
International Relations > International affairs > International agreement
International Relations > International affairs > International affairs > International relations
International Relations > International affairs > International affairs > Multilateral relations
International Relations > International security > Foreign policy
International Relations > International affairs > International affairs > Bilateral relations
International Relations > International affairs > International agreement > Cooperation agreement
International Relations > International affairs > International affairs > International meeting
International Relations > Cooperation policy > Aid policy > Development worker
International cooperation
Concept of International cooperation
See the dictionary definition of International cooperation.
Characteristics of International cooperation
Resources
Professional Content and Learning Tools
Lawi offers educational solutions and professional insight, integrating content, tools, and practical technology to promote lifelong learning, personal and professional improvement, and human progress through knowledge. Our collections feature resources and solutions from a wide range of subject areas, from management and finance to law and cybersecurity. This text is only a brief introduction. If you would like us to expand on this content, please let us know in the comments. If you’re finding our platform and publications valuable, share it with a colleague or friend, leave a comment and consider subscribing if you haven’t already (thanks!). There are group discounts, gift options, and referral bonuses available.
Translation of International cooperation
Spanish: Cooperación internacional
French: Coopération internationale
German: Internationale Zusammenarbeit
Italian: Cooperazione internazionale
Portuguese: Cooperação internacional
Polish: Współpraca międzynarodowa
Thesaurus of International cooperation
International Relations > Cooperation policy > Cooperation policy > International cooperation
International Relations > International affairs > International agreement > International cooperation
International Relations > International affairs > International affairs > International relations > International cooperation
International Relations > International affairs > International affairs > Multilateral relations > International cooperation
International Relations > International security > Foreign policy > International cooperation
International Relations > International affairs > International affairs > Bilateral relations > International cooperation
International Relations > International affairs > International agreement > Cooperation agreement > International cooperation
International Relations > International affairs > International affairs > International meeting > International cooperation
International Relations > Cooperation policy > Aid policy > Development worker > International cooperation
See Also
Including similar content viewed by others, in case you missed it: